I think the key is "This was proposed to fix the current situation where we have hundreds of similar SQL statements scattered around the system"
it's possibly worth trying to understand why this happened, as you've identified this as a maintenance nightmare. do you *need* to have all these hundreds of similar SQL needed? code for maintenance first, worry about performance later --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
