Hi all, Thanks for the useful comments guys!! It has brought some very good points that worth discussing with the team here.
Cheers Felix On Jan 12, 1:02 pm, "Barry Beattie" <[email protected]> wrote: > I think the key is > > "This was proposed to fix the current situation where we have hundreds > of similar SQL statements scattered > around the system" > > it's possibly worth trying to understand why this happened, as you've > identified this as a maintenance nightmare. > > do you *need* to have all these hundreds of similar SQL needed? > > code for maintenance first, worry about performance later --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
