Chris Velevitch wrote: > > Are you sure the problem is not with the method? The way I see it, the > method, whilst correctly determining the path, is doing something else > before returning the path.
Agreed Chris. Dump it Mike, Dump it :-) -- Yours, Kym Kovan mbcomms.net.au --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
