That is odd, Andrew, and no, I've not heard it happening before (but perhaps others have).
I will ask this, just to make sure we really are talking about the same thing: when you create the new instance, do you do it using the WAR file option (where you provide the name of a WAR file during the creation of the new instance)? Or do you not, which is by far the more typical way? I ask because it could indeed differ if you do use the WAR file option. For instance, one can create a WAR file during the install of CF Enterprise, and use it during the creation of an instance (not that one needs to bother, but sometimes people find some blog entry that recommends an approach and they follow it, not knowing any reason to do otherwise.) Well, such a stock WAR file would indeed then be very vanilla, with nothing but default Admin settings. Or you may have created the WAR file from an existing instance (another option which many never notice), and then used that to build the instance. If so, perhaps the WAR file was created when you had some settings set but just not datasources. But again, the far more common thing is not to bother specifying any WAR file when creating the new instance. If that's what you're doing, and you say there are some settings that propagate but not the datasources, that would indeed be strange. /charlie > -----Original Message----- > From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:cfaussie@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf Of Andrew Myers > Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 10:27 AM > To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [cfaussie] Re: CF 9 Monitor Alerts still being sent even > though not enabled? > > That's interesting Charlie. On my Windows dev machine, my Linux test > environment and my Linux production box I get zero datasources on any > new instances I create. I have CF 9.0.1 on them all. > > This is despite my "master" cfusion instance having over a half a > dozen datasources on all 3 installs. > > One thing I do have on each of them is an embedded derby datasource as > well. I was curious as to whether this could be a factor, however I > just removed it from my dev box out of curiosity, but when I created > another new instance it too had zero datasources. So it appears > that's not factor that's making a difference. > > I know we're getting away from the original topic but this is probably > why I never clued on to the fact that a new instance is actually a > copy of the cfusion instance, because I had to reconfigure the > datasources each time I created a new one. I wonder what makes me so > "special" that my datasources don't propagate? Have you ever heard of > this happening before? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.
