Hi Charlie, Definitely not using the war option. It's very strange - particularly that I can reproduce it every time on different machines. Guess I'm doing something unusual somewhere but I'm not sure what it is!
Andrew Sent from my mobile On 22/04/2011, at 9:09 AM, "charlie arehart" <[email protected]> wrote: > That is odd, Andrew, and no, I've not heard it happening before (but perhaps > others have). > > I will ask this, just to make sure we really are talking about the same > thing: when you create the new instance, do you do it using the WAR file > option (where you provide the name of a WAR file during the creation of the > new instance)? Or do you not, which is by far the more typical way? > > I ask because it could indeed differ if you do use the WAR file option. For > instance, one can create a WAR file during the install of CF Enterprise, and > use it during the creation of an instance (not that one needs to bother, but > sometimes people find some blog entry that recommends an approach and they > follow it, not knowing any reason to do otherwise.) Well, such a stock WAR > file would indeed then be very vanilla, with nothing but default Admin > settings. > > Or you may have created the WAR file from an existing instance (another > option which many never notice), and then used that to build the instance. > If so, perhaps the WAR file was created when you had some settings set but > just not datasources. > > But again, the far more common thing is not to bother specifying any WAR > file when creating the new instance. If that's what you're doing, and you > say there are some settings that propagate but not the datasources, that > would indeed be strange. > > /charlie > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Andrew Myers >> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 10:27 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [cfaussie] Re: CF 9 Monitor Alerts still being sent even >> though not enabled? >> >> That's interesting Charlie. On my Windows dev machine, my Linux test >> environment and my Linux production box I get zero datasources on any >> new instances I create. I have CF 9.0.1 on them all. >> >> This is despite my "master" cfusion instance having over a half a >> dozen datasources on all 3 installs. >> >> One thing I do have on each of them is an embedded derby datasource as >> well. I was curious as to whether this could be a factor, however I >> just removed it from my dev box out of curiosity, but when I created >> another new instance it too had zero datasources. So it appears >> that's not factor that's making a difference. >> >> I know we're getting away from the original topic but this is probably >> why I never clued on to the fact that a new instance is actually a >> copy of the cfusion instance, because I had to reconfigure the >> datasources each time I created a new one. I wonder what makes me so >> "special" that my datasources don't propagate? Have you ever heard of >> this happening before? >> > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "cfaussie" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.
