Hey Andrew, For what it's worth when ever I create a 'new' CF instance I can say for sure you won't get the data sources from the default cfusion instance.
If you are creating an instance 'from a WAR' then it depends what you chose to have included in that WAR file when it was created. Side note: if you run CF in console mode when creating a new instance you will see it generate an ANT build.xml. If you find this and take a copy of it, you can read it and gain a better understanding of what steps are taken to create a new instance :) Oh i'm rambling again... Happy Easter everyone! On 22/04/2011, at 5:57 PM, Andrew Myers <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Charlie, > > Definitely not using the war option. It's very strange - particularly that I > can reproduce it every time on different machines. Guess I'm doing something > unusual somewhere but I'm not sure what it is! > > Andrew > > Sent from my mobile > > On 22/04/2011, at 9:09 AM, "charlie arehart" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> That is odd, Andrew, and no, I've not heard it happening before (but perhaps >> others have). >> >> I will ask this, just to make sure we really are talking about the same >> thing: when you create the new instance, do you do it using the WAR file >> option (where you provide the name of a WAR file during the creation of the >> new instance)? Or do you not, which is by far the more typical way? >> >> I ask because it could indeed differ if you do use the WAR file option. For >> instance, one can create a WAR file during the install of CF Enterprise, and >> use it during the creation of an instance (not that one needs to bother, but >> sometimes people find some blog entry that recommends an approach and they >> follow it, not knowing any reason to do otherwise.) Well, such a stock WAR >> file would indeed then be very vanilla, with nothing but default Admin >> settings. >> >> Or you may have created the WAR file from an existing instance (another >> option which many never notice), and then used that to build the instance. >> If so, perhaps the WAR file was created when you had some settings set but >> just not datasources. >> >> But again, the far more common thing is not to bother specifying any WAR >> file when creating the new instance. If that's what you're doing, and you >> say there are some settings that propagate but not the datasources, that >> would indeed be strange. >> >> /charlie >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >>> Behalf Of Andrew Myers >>> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 10:27 AM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [cfaussie] Re: CF 9 Monitor Alerts still being sent even >>> though not enabled? >>> >>> That's interesting Charlie. On my Windows dev machine, my Linux test >>> environment and my Linux production box I get zero datasources on any >>> new instances I create. I have CF 9.0.1 on them all. >>> >>> This is despite my "master" cfusion instance having over a half a >>> dozen datasources on all 3 installs. >>> >>> One thing I do have on each of them is an embedded derby datasource as >>> well. I was curious as to whether this could be a factor, however I >>> just removed it from my dev box out of curiosity, but when I created >>> another new instance it too had zero datasources. So it appears >>> that's not factor that's making a difference. >>> >>> I know we're getting away from the original topic but this is probably >>> why I never clued on to the fact that a new instance is actually a >>> copy of the cfusion instance, because I had to reconfigure the >>> datasources each time I created a new one. I wonder what makes me so >>> "special" that my datasources don't propagate? Have you ever heard of >>> this happening before? >>> >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "cfaussie" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "cfaussie" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.
