On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 12:51:59PM +1000, Mark M wrote: > I must say - I'm quite exited about the prospects of 4.0 and v 4.1 (which is still > in > alpha of development)
> What is also planned for v 5.0 is also a long time coming, but also looks quite > promising. (stored procedures being one thing) By which time PostgreSQL will have been doing these for years, and will have added inbuilt replication, point-in-time recovery and a host of other features as well. How many of the problems on the Why-Not-MySQL? page have they addressed with the new editions? > I can see it being a very good quality alternative for those projects in which an > Access (shudder) db is used ANYTHING is better than Access. Paul "PostgreSQL user and pot-stirrer" Haddon Technical Services Manager Formstar Print Technologies --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MX Downunder AsiaPac DevCon - http://mxdu.com/
