I realized that, in asking this, most CFers (or programmers in any language) would usually want their code private, and understandably so. I was certainly not asking for people to reveal code which was proprietory or had any commercial-type need for protection. This is why I specified "publicly listed" - to exclude the vast majority, and only include code for programmers who want or are happy for the web community to see their code.
What Sean says below is roughly along the lines of what I was thinking. Ta. > On Monday, Oct 13, 2003, at 18:56 US/Pacific, Gary Menzel wrote: > > And why I also suggested the benorama site - because it is a good > > example > > of a framework in CFMX. > > Not to nit-pick but... benorama is a methodology, not a framework since > it doesn't really provide code... > > > Others have also suggested Mach-ii in the "framework" category. > > Yes, although there's not much in the way of code around Mach II. I'll > hopefully be publishing a 1,000+ line Mach II application shortly - > that's actually going to be live on macromedia.com - that illustrates > the DAO / gateway object stuff mentioned in the Development Guide. I'm > polishing the internals of the app now (to ensure it complies with > everything in the CFMX 6.1 Coding Guidelines and everything in the Mach > II Development Guide). > > Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ > > "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." > -- Margaret Atwood --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MX Downunder AsiaPac DevCon - http://mxdu.com/
