Hey Scott,

> Hi Taco,
> 
> Why don't you come around my pod and say it ta mah FACE! 
> heheheheheheeheh

I couldn't come over to your pod since I only work half days ;-))
 
> Nah good point man, but essentially the WIKI isn't meant to 
> be a literal 
> code by code starting point for the framework. Its more to 
> the point a 
> good example of what Spike & team believed BatFink 
> represented. Its by 
> no means a coding standard in that  you MUST follow it to the 
> letter, as 
> it meant to be loose and FLEXible (hehe) enough to handle any 
> personal 
> wants / needs without cornering you into becoming BatFink diciples.

Hmm, so it's not meant to grow and become some sort of a coding
standard/framework?
Is it just a bone for the hungry at the moment? ;-)

> Hope that helps? Personally, i've not yet fully used the new 
> "VIEW" or 
> "PRESENTER" mainly because i've been stuck in Flash Land, but 
> i've used 
> the MODEL over and over, and the more I use it the more I've 
> loved it. 
> That to me is the crux of BatFink in many ways :) but thats my Flash 
> Monkey Opinion.

Personally I have not had the change to look any further, but knowing you
guys it must be something good, looking forward to comment and possibly use
some of it, and maybe one of these days we can all bring our great ideas
together and create one solid framework ;-))

I'll stop reading here!

> Keep the opinions coming though, as the more YOU all use it 
> and have a 
> go at it, the cooler it will hopefully get.
> 
> (YES I'm also aware at how slow MossyBlog.com is, i'm busy now 
> converting it to a database instead of an XML only run 
> site.... hey how 
> the hell was i supposed to know it was popular....shit i'm 
> still amazed 
> you're reading this...heh whats with the travel industry and crashing 
> websites ;)..
> 


---
You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

MXDU2004 + Macromedia DevCon AsiaPac + Sydney, Australia
http://www.mxdu.com/ + 24-25 February, 2004

Reply via email to