Yep, but I'm ignoring you ;) Nah, just haven't got round to replying to it yet...
It's still early Monday morning on this side of the world ya know. Spike >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Steve Onnis >Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 10:09 AM >To: CFAussie Mailing List >Subject: [cfaussie] Re: BatFink Released... > >Hey spike > >get my email RE your friendly URL plugin? > >Steve > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of >Stephen Milligan >Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 4:56 AM >To: CFAussie Mailing List >Subject: [cfaussie] Re: BatFink Released... > > > >> >>Hmm, so it's not meant to grow and become some sort of a coding >>standard/framework? >>Is it just a bone for the hungry at the moment? ;-) >> > >It's supposed to give you enough structure to take some of the >more mundane decisions out of your life, but give you the >freedom and flexibility to be your own boss where you want. In >that sense, go right ahead and stick some password protection >on the application scope refresh. For the apps I'm building at >the minute, I use 4 application modes: > >debug and development - Application scope is reloaded on every >request testing - Application scope is refreshed using a url >variable live - You can't force the application scope to be refreshed. > >That just happens to be what suits me right now for the apps >I'm developing, but by all means use your own ideas. It's not >meant to be a rule book that tells you how you _must_ do >things. It's supposed to be more of a guide to how to >structure your applications. The important thing is that the >framework doesn't get bogged down in the details of how to >implement a specific piece of functionality rather that it >gives you some tools and ideas that make building apps faster >and more structured. With that in mind, there are still some >things that you _have_ to do when using Batfink because >otherwise you'd just be writing code and not using a framework at all. > >I also hesitate when calling Batfink a 'framework' because it >provides very little in the way of pre-written modules or >code, but does require that you structure your applications in >a particular way. > >I've stuck a blurb on http://www.spike.org.uk about it and am >happy to discuss it with anyone by email, or on IM >([EMAIL PROTECTED]) as long as that doesn't get in the way >of work that someone's paying me to do. > >Spike > > >--- >You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >MXDU2004 + Macromedia DevCon AsiaPac + Sydney, Australia >http://www.mxdu.com/ + 24-25 February, 2004 > > >--- >You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >MXDU2004 + Macromedia DevCon AsiaPac + Sydney, Australia >http://www.mxdu.com/ + 24-25 February, 2004 --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MXDU2004 + Macromedia DevCon AsiaPac + Sydney, Australia http://www.mxdu.com/ + 24-25 February, 2004
