|
It
very much depends on how mission critical your app is. If you are running an
e-commerce site and an hour of downtime is going to cost you $70,000 then yes
having two of everything makes sense. If you are going to lose $500 then
probably not.
On a
side note you don't necessarily need Enterprise or need to 'cluster' the boxes.
You could have x number of app servers running Standard with some kind
of load balancer out the front. The LB would split the incoming traffic amongst
the available boxes. If a single box fails then it gets taken out of the loop
and traffic is directed to the remaining boxes. However, in this case tho you
would lose any session info on the box that goes down.
On the
other point. You could have a front end web server serving static content
(images, static html pages, etc) and only forwarding .cfm requests back to the
app server. Having said that we combine the Web & CF servers on the
same box and have a separate box running the database
server.
Barry
--- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MXDU2004 + Macromedia DevCon AsiaPac + Sydney, Australia http://www.mxdu.com/ + 24-25 February, 2004 |
Title: Message
- [cfaussie] RE: Server architecture. Taco Fleur
- [cfaussie] Re: Server architecture. Pat Branley
- [cfaussie] RE: Server architecture. Mark Stanton
- [cfaussie] Re: Server architecture. George Lu
- [cfaussie] Re: Server architecture. KNOTT, Brian
- [cfaussie] Re: Server architecture. Barry Moore
- [cfaussie] Re: Server architecture. James Macpherson
- [cfaussie] Re: Server architecture. George Lu
- [cfaussie] Re: Server architecture. Barry Moore
- [cfaussie] Re: Server architecture. phaddon
- [cfaussie] Re: Server architecture. George Lu
