> i dunno if you can use mathematics as a basis for your argument. > consider this > > x = x + 1
You're absolutely right here. It would have made moer sense if the various languages which have = and == for assignment and evaluation of equality had done it the other way around, really. But that doesn't have anything to do with the fact that <= and >= are going to be more meaningful to more people than LTE and GTE. > <cfif x > y > No-one has suggesting that. > </cfif> > ?? im sure that isnt valid xml. It's funny you should say that. <cfif> <cfelse> </cfif> How XML compliant is *that*? CFML is not a dialect of XML. Nor has it ever claimed to be. -- Adam --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
