|
Yeah,
maybe I have been blessed, lol. As I said, I have had different reactions with
MX server on a regular basis, especially when sand box security is
installed.
Hardware:
Dual
2.4ghz Xeon
15k
RPM SCSI drives (no RAID)
1 gig
registered ECC ram
Load,
if you are asking by page views, about 30k page views per day. This what you
were asking?
Thanks!
Robert
Bailey
Famous for
nothing
It is wonderful that
you didn’t have any problems. However, that doesn’t really speak to whether or
not there is scalability issues with the use of CFCs for models in MVC. What
kind of hardware are you using to obtain what kind of load?
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Bailey
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 3:06
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [CFCDev] MVCF at
benorama.com
I have not had any
problems on my latest application, using Windows 2000, CFMX with updater 3,
and IIS 5
But then, I have
developed applications on one MX server and when moved to a production MX
server it behaved differently, even when the configuration was the same. Go
figure. The only problem I came across this last project is how MX does not
like to play with some objects nicely, so I had to give some of the work to
ASP, but played together rather nicely.
Thanks!
Robert
Bailey
Famous for
nothing
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 3:01
PM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
RE: [CFCDev] MVCF at benorama.com
The testing I have
conducted shows that the using CFCs as models in an MVC pattern will not
scale without serious hacks. It is possible that a framework will emerge
that provides these hacks, but I haven’t seen any as of yet. Please look to
the archives of this list for discussion of these scalability
issues.
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davis, Eric
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 1:55
PM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
[CFCDev] MVCF at benorama.com
Link:
<http://www.benorama.com/coldfusion/>
Word ver.: <http://www.benorama.com/coldfusion/patterns/MVCF.doc>
Has
anyone looked really hard at this one? What are everybody's thoughts on
this?
I'm
looking for a replacement to Fusebox 3 for MX - FBMX is too slow coming, and
probably won't make much sense anyway (I'm guessing it'll be quite
obfuscatory and rather difficult to implement the first five to ten
times).
He's
put together quite a presentation, and he about has me convinced, if only I
can simplify the structure a bit. I'm trying to find the right methodology
for my team here to use, and they're NONE of them big methodology-users.
Anyway,
just haven't seen any threads about this, and wondered if you folks had
anything to say on the subject.
Which
of course you must; you always do. ;)
Thanks,
ecd.
--
Eric C.
Davis
Programmer/Analyst I
Georgia Department of
Transportation
Office of I.T. Applications
404.463.2860.158
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
