Great to see you here, Ben, and to hear you share so many thoughts. It will add measurably to the conversation on CFC's. And of course, I'm tickled to see this discussion of Ben's work.
This has been an interesting conversation, on many levels. ;-} I, like others, am still evaluating all the alternatives. One thing that struck me from a recent comment was that we needed to be prepared to bring any of the several frameworks and methodologies to bear on each different project. I'm sure many feel that it's just too challenging to become adept in understanding and implementing all of them in order to take that approach. Of course, others will assert that leads to the "sheep" mentality or the attempt to apply the wrong solution to a problem, but it's a reality that there are just too many different levels of understanding by so many (on a team, in the community, supporting or knocking a given approach) that it's easy to see how some would just throw up there arms and either skip choosing one altogether, or choosing one "sheepishly". :-) /charlie > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Benoit Hediard > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 10:46 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [CFCDev] MVCF at benorama.com > > > Hi everyone, > > Sorry if I join this discussion a little bit late (thanks to > Howard Fore and > Robert Bailey for the invitation!). > I am glad to get feedbacks from "MVCF". > <snip> ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).
