> Here's our experience. > > The difference between cml and cfscript is neglible. > > We wrote a cfx tag to use the MS XML Parser when doing xslt, > so we find XSLT about 3-5 times faster than XmlTransform(). > Also, it is much faster and scales much better than CFMX > functions when dealing with XML. Although writing XSLT is > painful so we only use it for front-end.
I hate to say it (and continue a thread) but surely, if you aren't going to use xmltransform(), then wouldn't it be better to use the native Java XML API to do the work? Far better than using COM... This isn't off topic as I am really interested about use of XML in CFC's and whether or not people actually have created CFC's for just XML processing for specific applications. Paul ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).
