I call that bad coding? No reason for cfincludes to be that way, if your sql statement is that large with conditionals and such, it should be a storedproc.
~Todd
Adam Cameron wrote:
I think that cfinclude is not cut + paste, and it IS the expectedbehavior that you cannot have CFC-specific tags within an included template. cfargument and cfreturn are integral parts of the cffunction tag,I can show you a file I <cfinclude> that is chock full of <cfqueryparam> tags, and not a <cfquery> tag in sight. So how does that work, then? Adam
