RE: [CFCDev] More CFMX Excellence with Component Inheritance

[Brian Kotek]

Title: Message

Not sure that's the point, Todd.  What if he's using a database that doesn't support stored procedures?  I think the point is that in some cases, cfinclude behaves in different ways, and aside from trial-and-error there's really no way to know for sure how it's going to respond.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Rafferty
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 4:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CFCDev] More CFMX Excellence with Component Inheritance

I call that bad coding?  No reason for cfincludes to be that way, if your sql statement is that large with conditionals and such, it should be a storedproc.

~Todd

Adam Cameron wrote:

I think that cfinclude is not cut + paste, and it IS the expected
    

behavior that you cannot have CFC-specific tags within an included
template. cfargument and cfreturn are integral parts of the cffunction
tag,

I can show you a file I <cfinclude> that is chock full of <cfqueryparam>
tags, and not a <cfquery> tag in sight.

So how does that work, then?

Adam