>I call that bad coding? I think you're - and I suspect purposely - missing the point.
> No reason for cfincludes to be that way, Bad coding or otherwise (and we will have to disagree, here), it's syntactically valid, and it is counter to how others are claiming <cfcinclude> ought to work. > if your sql statement is that large with conditionals and such, it should be a storedproc. There's a number of reasons why this suggestion is not sensible or relevant. Adam ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
