On May 19, 2004, at 10:40 AM, Tom Woestman wrote:
I have never tested the performance of this solution but we did decide not
to use this configuration in our cluster due to the risk of the entire site
going down if the shared volume becomes unavailable.
Your right but we also have electronic document management. having those files on a file server where we have regular back ups has been a life saver.
I suspect the performance hit would be small as I believe each system that
references the files would compile them to class files placed in the local
system.
This is a concern for us does anyone have a more solid answer for this?
Ian
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ian Sheridan 1-917-520-1253 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.savagevines.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email.
CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).
An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
