On Sun, 3 Oct 2004 12:36:34 -0700 (PDT), Rob Rusher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Might I suggest that you look at the decompiled java code produced by each > version of your code. > > I have found that the non-cfscript version has more whitespace code generated > while the actual "meat" of the code is compiled to the same thing. > > So, in general, cfscript produces faster code than its non-cfscript > counterpart. >
Eh? The whitespace argument doesn't really apply in this case, I don't think. In the end, you're talking about the compiled code that gets executed on the server, which is whitespace-ignorant. What you really want to compare is the *syntax* differences in the resulting Java between coding with cfloop vs. cfscript loop. The whitespace argument really applies to any space that might exist in your resulting HTML page that CF generates in the output buffer. That whitespace is sent to the browser, hence inflating the overall page size the web server needs to serve and the browser needs to download, thereby increasing overhead/load on both ends. Again, though, this point doesn't apply to the cfscript vs. tag argument. Regards, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
