On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:44:01 +1300, Adam Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nah. You know what MM are like with behavioural changes to existing > functionality, even *if* the existing functionality is wrong (remember > our conversation about how int() doesn't work properly in CF?).
int()? No , I don't remember... refresh my memory... And besides, MM have certainly implemented some of your enhancement requests and fixed bugs that you have submitted. > I can see how myStruct.toString() could output > WDDX. It doesn't. Try it. > It's fine. We had it as a CFM page that calls the CFC to start with, > but that's ALL the CFM page was doing. I just figured it'd be nice to > call the CFC directly... and... get back what I actually asked for... Like I say, the result format is entirely dependent on the caller and for a given caller, the format is always the same. Very consistent :) -- Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/ Team Fusebox -- http://www.fusebox.org/ Got Gmail? -- I have 1 invite "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
