Not sure if I speak for anyone but myself, but are you always this unpleasant and sarcastic? Jesus. Bit too much pissing and moaning going on, despite the clear attempts on the part of others, Sean mostly, not to respond to your jibes in kind. Also a bit surprising given the overall good nature of this mailing list.
Just had to be said. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Cameron > Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 9:27 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [CFCDev] Calling CFC method as URL always returns WDDX? > > > >int()? No , I don't remember... refresh my memory... > > Really, must I? > > "int()" should return the integer component of a number. Yet > last time I tested, int(-4.9) would return -5. So "int()" > kind of works like "round()", which is a different thing. > The (your) response was "well it's documented to work that > way, so neener neener neener" (or something like that ;-) > > > >And besides, MM have certainly implemented some of your enhancement > requests and fixed bugs that you have submitted. > > Clap clap. They've fixed bugs. I must arrange a parade for them. > > But yeah, they've been pretty good at the enhancement requests. > > > >> I can see how myStruct.toString() could output WDDX. > > >It doesn't. Try it. > > My example was pseudo code to simply give a label to the > process that ought to be going on. I wasn't meaning the > *real* toString() Java method. That should have been obvious > by my mention of another pseduo-code notion toWDDX(). > > > >Like I say, the result format is entirely dependent on the caller and > for a given caller, the format is always the same. Very consistent :) > > You're being a bit circular there. But if it makes you feel > better, that's cool. > > Adam > > > (PS: tongue was in cheek for entire time I was typing the > above, don't take it the wrong way...) > ---------------------------------------------------------- > You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' > in the message of the email. > > CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported > by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). > > An archive of the CFCDev list is available at > www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
