@mark i - I found this thread in the CFWheels Google Group that might be of interest ( http://groups.google.com/group/cfwheels/browse_thread/thread/ab23dbf88379920e )
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Michael Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi. > Just had a quick look at cfwheels (what an odd name!). It's got some > similarities to the framework I'm currently developing (called Glacier - am > actually using it in production) in that the URLs are mapped to controller > functions. cfwheels looks interesting, but I would say beware the version > number - very low for something you might want to adopt. > > On the question of model components that map to tables, it's one of those > ideas that is good in principal. However, in principal, it only works right > up until that moment where you have a piece of business logic that crosses > over between two (or more) tables. For instance, take a property website. > You have one table for 'house' and one table for 'estate agent'. If you > want > the agent for that house, which model object do you put the function in. It > gets a bit arbitrary, but at least it has structure. In my opinion, if > you're going to do this, you have to be very strict with yourself and be > prepared to create 'gateway' model objects which can act as overarching > packaging objects for anything that doesn't fit your pattern. > > > -- > Mike Horne > > > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Mark Ireland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > I do find this list is not the best one for noob OOP questions. > > > > Which list would people suggest is better? > > > > You may already know that "Mark Mandel is a software developer in > Melbourne Australia that spends most of his working day developing in > ColdFusion and Java." He wrote transfer-orm and is one of the few people to > respond to my post at all :-( > > > > I need an opinion on the whole idea of model components that are named > after a table and have properties that exactly match the tables column > names? > > (I am told this idea comes from Ruby On Rails - which was flavour of the > month for a while) > > > > ________________________________ > > Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 08:20:02 +1000 > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [CFCDEV] Re: cfwheels > > > > And that would be 'bad netiiquette', not 'mad net-iquette'... > > > > Again caught by the posting at 8am bug. > > > > Mark > > > > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Mark Mandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Mark - > > > > For future reference, it's normally considered mad net-iquette to cross > post the same query to multiple mailing lists in one go. It gets considered > spam. > > > > So far I've seen this on CFEclipse, transfer-dev and now CFCDev. > > > > Figured I would let you know, > > > > Mark > > > > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 7:42 AM, markireland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Anyone on the list got an opinion on www.cfwheels.com > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > -- > > E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > W: www.compoundtheory.com > > > > > > -- > > E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > W: www.compoundtheory.com > > > > > > ________________________________ > > Find out: SEEK Salary Centre Are you paid what you're worth? > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CFCDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
