On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 6:16 AM, Mark Ireland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I need an opinion on the whole idea of model components that are named > after a table and have properties that exactly match the tables column > names? > (I am told this idea comes from Ruby On Rails - which was flavour of the > month for a while) > I love it. Even if you were not going to use an ORM framework that builds your components' persistence and views surrounding it automatically, I don't know why anyone would choose to name things differently in the database than they would be using in the code. That's just masochistic. I used to be a code masochist, but I've been reformed. I have no problems with it. I haven't used wheels in a while, but I'd certainly give it a chance if the need arose. There's not a lot of ceremony in it last time I checked, as opposed to many other frameworks. Sam --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CFCDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
