On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Henry <[email protected]> wrote: > > How come everyone uses Transfer... I don't, and I can't. > > Unfortunately, my application is complex enough that Transfer doesn't > fit the bill, and I've not had a good experience with Transfer so far, > because it tends to throw exceptions that I have no idea what I did > wrong at my part. I ended up spending the time to debug Transfer more > than getting things done. I'm really looking forward to CF9's > hibernate functionality. However, I'm glad that Transfer works for > many of you. >
Hmm, perhaps many people use Transfer because it rocks! It's incredibly flexible, so I'm surprised to hear that you find that it won't work for you due to a "complex application". I'm guessing that a lot of Transfer users have pretty complex applications as well. There is a bit of a learning curve (hence the exceptions that you didn't immediately understand), but once you're over the hump it can be very productive. I will be pleasantly surprised if CF9's hibernate support is as easy and flexible as Transfer out-of-the-box. I realize that I'm gushing like some sort of Transfer fanboy, so I'll shut up now. Bob -- Bob Silverberg www.silverwareconsulting.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CFCDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
