Yes, I should update my perception of Transfer. It didn't work for me because I updated the JDBC driver for Ms-SQL. After I update my datasource to use the original JDBC driver, things are working smoothly so far. However, as powerful as Transfer, there's still a place for a more traditional approach with custom DAO, right? :)
Henry On Jan 31, 3:24 am, Mark Mandel <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:26 AM, Henry <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yes, this is more like a survey and I'm not looking for 'rules to > > write a correct DAO'. > > > How come everyone uses Transfer... I don't, and I can't. > > > Unfortunately, my application is complex enough that Transfer doesn't > > fit the bill, and I've not had a good experience with Transfer so far, > > because it tends to throw exceptions that I have no idea what I did > > wrong at my part. I ended up spending the time to debug Transfer more > > than getting things done. I'm really looking forward to CF9's > > hibernate functionality. However, I'm glad that Transfer works for > > many of you. > > Henry, I'm confused by your statement here, I've checked all the > mailing list posts you have made, and they all got answered > satisfactorily, with solutions to your problems. > > Can you be more specific about your limiting problems? > > Mark > > -- > E: [email protected] > W:www.compoundtheory.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CFCDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
