On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Ehsan Akhgari <[email protected]> wrote:
> That's OK, the main intention behind this patch is to unbreak code that > assumes gcc specific things based on #ifdef __i386__ and friends... > > With that in mind, does this look good to land? > This patch also removes the #error lines from all the intrinsics headers. Did you intend that to be part of this patch? It's a good idea, but the backend actually asserts when they are used, like David said. > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D4415 > > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
