On 19 Aug 2014 08:55, "Aaron Ballman" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > LGTM, thanks! > > > > It looks like you didn't add -std=gnu++14. Is there a reason for that? It > > seems useful, even if GCC doesn't support it yet. > > I wasn't certain whether we wanted it. I will add it in. > > > Also, I spied a CXX1YCOMPAT macro in one of the tests you updated :) > > I will double-check that and fix before committing. > > Blind curiosity, is this something we want for the release? Or has > that ship sailed?
If Bill is amenable, adding just the -std=c++14 change directly to the branch (and none of the other renaming) seems like a good idea to me.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
