On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On 19 Aug 2014 08:55, "Aaron Ballman" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Richard Smith <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > LGTM, thanks! >> > >> > It looks like you didn't add -std=gnu++14. Is there a reason for that? >> > It >> > seems useful, even if GCC doesn't support it yet. >> >> I wasn't certain whether we wanted it. I will add it in. >> >> > Also, I spied a CXX1YCOMPAT macro in one of the tests you updated :) >> >> I will double-check that and fix before committing. >> >> Blind curiosity, is this something we want for the release? Or has >> that ship sailed? > > If Bill is amenable, adding just the -std=c++14 change directly to the > branch (and none of the other renaming) seems like a good idea to me.
Bill, what are your thoughts on this idea? ~Aaron _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
