I know that ’14 is out now, but that happened after the branching. I don’t even know if we’re promising full c++14 support in this. Let’s just wait until the next release.
-bw On Aug 19, 2014, at 9:26 AM, Aaron Ballman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 19 Aug 2014 08:55, "Aaron Ballman" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Richard Smith <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> LGTM, thanks! >>>> >>>> It looks like you didn't add -std=gnu++14. Is there a reason for that? >>>> It >>>> seems useful, even if GCC doesn't support it yet. >>> >>> I wasn't certain whether we wanted it. I will add it in. >>> >>>> Also, I spied a CXX1YCOMPAT macro in one of the tests you updated :) >>> >>> I will double-check that and fix before committing. >>> >>> Blind curiosity, is this something we want for the release? Or has >>> that ship sailed? >> >> If Bill is amenable, adding just the -std=c++14 change directly to the >> branch (and none of the other renaming) seems like a good idea to me. > > Bill, what are your thoughts on this idea? > > ~Aaron _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
