On 01/21/15 12:35, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:45:53PM -0000, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
This breaks code using "volatile void" to mark functions as no-return, an oldish GCC extension. This is still somewhat popular in old code. Do we really want to / have to create a hard error for this?
It did seem a very picky, but unrejected, bug report And I'd forgotten about the gcc extension you mention. Perhaps it should be a pedantic error and warning otherwise?
nathan _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
