On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 01:04:12PM -0500, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > On 01/21/15 12:35, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > >On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:45:53PM -0000, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > > >This breaks code using "volatile void" to mark functions as no-return, > >an oldish GCC extension. This is still somewhat popular in old code. Do > >we really want to / have to create a hard error for this? > > It did seem a very picky, but unrejected, bug report And I'd > forgotten about the gcc extension you mention. Perhaps it should be > a pedantic error and warning otherwise?
That's perfectly fine with me. Joerg _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
