On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 01:04:12PM -0500, Nathan Sidwell wrote: >> On 01/21/15 12:35, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: >> >On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:45:53PM -0000, Nathan Sidwell wrote: >> >> >This breaks code using "volatile void" to mark functions as no-return, >> >an oldish GCC extension. This is still somewhat popular in old code. Do >> >we really want to / have to create a hard error for this? >> >> It did seem a very picky, but unrejected, bug report And I'd >> forgotten about the gcc extension you mention. Perhaps it should be >> a pedantic error and warning otherwise? > > That's perfectly fine with me.
Yep, an ExtWarn works for me too. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
