FYI, by "regression" I meant there was a functionality which was not broken but rather disabled as a whole :)
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> wrote: > Regressions are not OK. Unless the fix is imminent, we should revert and > work on a correct patch. > > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Timur Iskhodzhanov <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> FTR, this patch has regressed: >> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13231 >> >> Now I can't build non-trivial C++ code anymore. >> [I had local patches to work OK on some files and was planning to send >> a few things for review but now I'm literally stuck at ~r158985] >> >> Please fix this ASAP or I'll have to revert it (locally, maybe; but >> this is still not cool). >> >> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Charles Davis <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > On Jun 23, 2012, at 1:11 PM, John McCall wrote: >> >> The remaining trivial patch, which just declares, defines, and calls >> >> EmitVTables, is approved. >> > Thanks, r159091. >> > >> > Chip >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > cfe-commits mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >> _______________________________________________ >> cfe-commits mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > > _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
