If it's not completely consistent, then you lose the ability to say,
in one sentence "the correspondence is X", which still means you have
to go back to the docs to look up the correspondence ("is this one of
the ones that isn't named consistently?").I think that it is a case of "premature optimization" to not go all the way. Why not "go all the way" and then scale back later if it gets to be a pain to write or another issue is found? Thanks, --Sean Silva On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Manuel Klimek <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm wondering whether we'll really get the benefit if we don't go all the > way. > > http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D21 > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
