Sorry, I was replying directly to Manuel's comment "I'm wondering whether we'll really get the benefit if we don't go all the way.", not on the patch per se.
btw, Manuel, it seems like the comments are getting duplicated, any idea why that's happening? --Sean Silva On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Daniel Jasper <[email protected]> wrote: > You either have not read/understood my last comment/commit message or I > don't understand what you mean. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Sean Silva > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> If it's not completely consistent, then you lose the ability to say, >> in one sentence "the correspondence is X", which still means you have >> to go back to the docs to look up the correspondence ("is this one of >> the ones that isn't named consistently?"). >> >> I think that it is a case of "premature optimization" to not go all >> the way. Why not "go all the way" and then scale back later if it gets >> to be a pain to write or another issue is found? >> >> Thanks, >> >> --Sean Silva >> >> http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D21 > > _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
