You either have not read/understood my last comment/commit message or I don't understand what you mean.
Cheers, Daniel On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Sean Silva < [email protected]> wrote: > > If it's not completely consistent, then you lose the ability to say, > in one sentence "the correspondence is X", which still means you have > to go back to the docs to look up the correspondence ("is this one of > the ones that isn't named consistently?"). > > I think that it is a case of "premature optimization" to not go all > the way. Why not "go all the way" and then scale back later if it gets > to be a pain to write or another issue is found? > > Thanks, > > --Sean Silva > > http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D21 >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
