> > This is what he meant, what's the point of doing this as a short term > fix when the full fix is both a) not much more work and b) there are > objections to the existing patch? > > You put a patch up for review and then didn't respond to the review > before you committed it. >
Jim pointed out that this may have come across a bit more harsh than was meant. It was meant to say "hey, there were some concerns over in the original thread, can we go back to those first?". We're doing that now so awesome. -eric _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
