> There is no disagreement on coming up with a good name. I just don't think we > should tackle the "optimize-for-size-level" part. Ideally it's one attribute > with rather than multiple attributes. i.e. > > optsize=1 > optsize=2 > optsize=3 > > Rather than > > optsize > optsizeharder > optsizereallyhard > > The former will require significant changes and it is not something we'd want > Quentin to tackle at this time. > > For the record, -Os / -Oz do not have exact definitions. They are > (intentionally?) subject to interpretation by different compilers / targets. >
This is why I hate -Oz :) As a range of values it could work, but let's just pick some better names for now, how about a quick straw poll: OptSize/ForceOptSize -> OptSize/MinSize something else? -eric _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
