On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Eric Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: >> There is no disagreement on coming up with a good name. I just don't think >> we should tackle the "optimize-for-size-level" part. Ideally it's one >> attribute with rather than multiple attributes. i.e. >> >> optsize=1 >> optsize=2 >> optsize=3 >> >> Rather than >> >> optsize >> optsizeharder >> optsizereallyhard >> >> The former will require significant changes and it is not something we'd >> want Quentin to tackle at this time. >> >> For the record, -Os / -Oz do not have exact definitions. They are >> (intentionally?) subject to interpretation by different compilers / targets. >> > > This is why I hate -Oz :) > > As a range of values it could work, but let's just pick some better > names for now, how about a quick straw poll: > > OptSize/ForceOptSize -> OptSize/MinSize
+1 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
