> Looks like "as written" is a somewhat fuzzy concept for
> instantiations. Maybe it would be more regular to say that a
> instantiated function gets a static storage class if the template
> isStatic()? That should allow us to remove the
> getTemplateSpecializationInfo in isStatic().

The attached patch does it. Do you think it is an improvement?

Cheers,
Rafael

Attachment: t.patch
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to