On Apr 16, 2013, at 3:25 PM, Rafael Espíndola <[email protected]>
wrote:
>>> The linkage spec decl (only the variant without braces) seems to propagate
>>> its "extern" keyword down to the inner decl as a *written* storage class. I
>>> guess this is not really meant.
>>
>>
>> No, this is an anachronism from the days prior to linkage computation. I
>> think it can be zapped.
>
> To be clear, getStorageClass should return SC_None for
>
> extern "C" void foo();
>
> and we should have a separate bit for isSingleLineExternC (to
> implement [dcl.link] p7). Correct?
Or we could just compute isSingleLineExternC by checking whether the
DeclContext is a LinkageSpecDecl without braces.
- Doug
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
