On Apr 13, 2013, at 11:10 PM, Rafael Espíndola <[email protected]>
wrote:
>> Looks like "as written" is a somewhat fuzzy concept for
>> instantiations. Maybe it would be more regular to say that a
>> instantiated function gets a static storage class if the template
>> isStatic()? That should allow us to remove the
>> getTemplateSpecializationInfo in isStatic().
>
> The attached patch does it. Do you think it is an improvement?
Yes, I think it's an improvement. LGTM!
- Doug
> Cheers,
> Rafael
> <t.patch>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
