"unix" includes an awful lot of generic things (like malloc itself). Part of the problem here is that our "core" checkers are always on. We don't have "generic-but-not-required" checkers right now.
Jordan On Mar 19, 2014, at 13:55, Ted Kremenek <[email protected]> wrote: > By that argument, does it belong in “unix”? What about Windows-specific > allocators? > > On Mar 19, 2014, at 1:45 PM, Jordan Rose <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It's currently specific to C++, but I'm not sure it's inherently specific to >> C++. I can imagine the FreeBSD guys adding support for custom C allocators >> too. So I'm not sure it's worth moving. >> >> Jordan >> >> >> On Mar 19, 2014, at 13:27, Ted Kremenek <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Seems fine to me. >>> >>> On Mar 19, 2014, at 1:12 PM, Anton Yartsev <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> Propose to move the MismatchedDeallocator checker from unix.* to >>>> cplusplus.* group if you don't think it's too late. This check is specific >>>> for C++. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Anton >>>> >>>> <MismatchedDeallocator_rebase.patch>_______________________________________________ >>>> cfe-commits mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
