You didn’t really answer my question. What is the right answer here? On Mar 19, 2014, at 2:05 PM, Jordan Rose <[email protected]> wrote:
> "unix" includes an awful lot of generic things (like malloc itself). Part of > the problem here is that our "core" checkers are always on. We don't have > "generic-but-not-required" checkers right now. > > Jordan > > > On Mar 19, 2014, at 13:55, Ted Kremenek <[email protected]> wrote: > >> By that argument, does it belong in “unix”? What about Windows-specific >> allocators? >> >> On Mar 19, 2014, at 1:45 PM, Jordan Rose <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It's currently specific to C++, but I'm not sure it's inherently specific >>> to C++. I can imagine the FreeBSD guys adding support for custom C >>> allocators too. So I'm not sure it's worth moving. >>> >>> Jordan >>> >>> >>> On Mar 19, 2014, at 13:27, Ted Kremenek <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Seems fine to me. >>>> >>>> On Mar 19, 2014, at 1:12 PM, Anton Yartsev <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi! >>>>> >>>>> Propose to move the MismatchedDeallocator checker from unix.* to >>>>> cplusplus.* group if you don't think it's too late. This check is >>>>> specific for C++. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Anton >>>>> >>>>> <MismatchedDeallocator_rebase.patch>_______________________________________________ >>>>> cfe-commits mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >>>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
