More to the point, *should* we leave it as “unix”? Anton’s proposed change was motivated by some conceptual dissonance here.
On Mar 19, 2014, at 5:08 PM, Ted Kremenek <[email protected]> wrote: > You didn’t really answer my question. What is the right answer here? > > On Mar 19, 2014, at 2:05 PM, Jordan Rose <[email protected]> wrote: > >> "unix" includes an awful lot of generic things (like malloc itself). Part of >> the problem here is that our "core" checkers are always on. We don't have >> "generic-but-not-required" checkers right now. >> >> Jordan >> >> >> On Mar 19, 2014, at 13:55, Ted Kremenek <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> By that argument, does it belong in “unix”? What about Windows-specific >>> allocators? >>> >>> On Mar 19, 2014, at 1:45 PM, Jordan Rose <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> It's currently specific to C++, but I'm not sure it's inherently specific >>>> to C++. I can imagine the FreeBSD guys adding support for custom C >>>> allocators too. So I'm not sure it's worth moving. >>>> >>>> Jordan >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mar 19, 2014, at 13:27, Ted Kremenek <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Seems fine to me. >>>>> >>>>> On Mar 19, 2014, at 1:12 PM, Anton Yartsev <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi! >>>>>> >>>>>> Propose to move the MismatchedDeallocator checker from unix.* to >>>>>> cplusplus.* group if you don't think it's too late. This check is >>>>>> specific for C++. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Anton >>>>>> >>>>>> <MismatchedDeallocator_rebase.patch>_______________________________________________ >>>>>> cfe-commits mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
