ping On 26 March 2014 20:17, Rafael Espíndola <[email protected]> wrote: > On 23 March 2014 23:21, Eric Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'm down with the general idea, people wanting a cutting edge compiler >> with an old assembler would be an odd use case that I'm not sure we >> care overly much about. > > The make the proposal more concrete, is the attached clang patch OK? > > It removes support from the clang side. If that is OK, we can wait a > couple of weeks before removing the support from the llvm side. > > Cheers, > Rafael
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
