Me too. Thanks Rafael, -Chris
On Apr 29, 2014, at 2:42 PM, Eric Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: > Apologies, I'd actually thought Chris had gotten this. > > At any rate, I'm cool with this. > > LGTM. > > -eric > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Rafael Espíndola > <[email protected]> wrote: >> ping >> >> On 26 March 2014 20:17, Rafael Espíndola <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 23 March 2014 23:21, Eric Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I'm down with the general idea, people wanting a cutting edge compiler >>>> with an old assembler would be an odd use case that I'm not sure we >>>> care overly much about. >>> >>> The make the proposal more concrete, is the attached clang patch OK? >>> >>> It removes support from the clang side. If that is OK, we can wait a >>> couple of weeks before removing the support from the llvm side. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Rafael _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
