Apologies, I'd actually thought Chris had gotten this. At any rate, I'm cool with this.
LGTM. -eric On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Rafael Espíndola <[email protected]> wrote: > ping > > On 26 March 2014 20:17, Rafael Espíndola <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 23 March 2014 23:21, Eric Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I'm down with the general idea, people wanting a cutting edge compiler >>> with an old assembler would be an odd use case that I'm not sure we >>> care overly much about. >> >> The make the proposal more concrete, is the attached clang patch OK? >> >> It removes support from the clang side. If that is OK, we can wait a >> couple of weeks before removing the support from the llvm side. >> >> Cheers, >> Rafael _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
