On 23/05/2014 09:02, Alexander Kornienko wrote:
Slightly shorter and more expensive, I would say.

It is just a minor change, but more expensive? That does not sound beneficial?

Also, you missed this question:

        }
     }
     return llvm::make_error_code(llvm::errc::not_supported);


Should this line be changed too?

Cheers,
Tobias
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to